Explore the problem ...
A Captured System Doesn’t Need to Hide. It Just Needs You Not to Look Too Closely.
What happens behind the doors of Washington’s family courts stays there—by design.
Judges and commissioners operate in a silo of discretion, shielded by institutional silence and legitimized by political alliances. The public is told that these courts are fair. Victims are told the system is working. Professionals who know better are told to stay quiet—or risk losing access and funding.
Judicial Associations and Lobbyists Are Writing the Rules. Not the Legislature.
In Washington, much of family court “policy” isn’t created through transparent legislation. It’s crafted by unelected judicial associations and interest groups with lobbyist that operate without public scrutiny. These associations draft internal policies, push them to lawmakers, and present them as neutral reform—when they’re really about consolidating judicial power. - They propose “clarifications” that expand discretion. - They oppose transparency measures. - They frame oversight as a threat to justice, not a safeguard. And they succeed—because too many in legislature are listening to the judiciary, not the public.
Commissioners Hold the Power. And You Never Elected Them.
In most family court cases, the judge isn’t the one making decisions. It’s a court commissioner—a judicial officer appointed by judges, not elected by you.
Commissioners:
- Are not publicly vetted.
- Are not subject to election or recall.
- Hold authority over your children, your rights, and your future.
This is not representative democracy. It’s bureaucratic control without consent.
Nonprofits Funded to Protect Survivors Stay Silent—Or Worse, Complicit
Taxpayer-funded Domestic Violence and social services organizations in Washington should be leading the charge against systemic harm. Instead:
- Many are beholden to a single lead agency that dictates messaging.
- Effectively zero provide legal aid for family court matters.
- Almost none are willing to call out judicial misconduct.
- They attack victims for speaking out.
Why? Because their funding and access depend on staying in the court’s good graces.
They know what’s happening.
They know survivors are being harmed.
But they say nothing.
Oversight Boards Are Toothless—and Often Run by the Very Institutions They’re Supposed to Monitor
Judicial conduct commissions, grievance boards, and professional review panels are supposed to act as checks on abuse.
Instead, they protect the system from accountability:
- Judges rarely face discipline—even for repeated due process violations.
- Complaints are dismissed or buried.
- No independent body audits outcomes for children or families.
This isn’t oversight. It’s institutional maintenance.
This Is the System. It Was Never Designed for You.
Family court operates like a private club:
- Controlled by insiders.
- Unaccountable to the public.
- Protected by political cover and professional silence.
When Victims try to speak out, organize, or participate in “reform", they’re told the same thing:
"Let the experts handle it."
But those “experts” are the ones who built the problem—and profit from it.
Victims are pushed to the margins, while the architects of the crisis stay in control.
That’s not reform. That’s regime protection.
If you’re wondering why your evidence wasn’t considered, why your child wasn’t protected, or why no one is listening—it’s not a mistake.
It’s working exactly as they intended.